EQ

1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

2. Review the following EQs and tell us if each meets the rule of three and why they do or don't.

a) What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?

The wording is clear, it provides a framework for studies and research, and the question is not a list of facts. However, this EQ does not completely follow the rule of three; the student should be more specific about the means by which a person would be losing weight. The most important factor could be different for daily exercise 

b) What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?

This EQ does follow the rule of three; it  specific, allows the student to argue for his position, and is not a yes/no question.

c) What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?

 This EQ does not follow the rule of three. The question is too broad.

d) How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?

This EQ does not follow the rule of three. While the question mentions specific elements such as anesthesiologist and chronic pain, it seems too broad. At the same time it seems like the question limits research to just treatment options for chronic pain (which could be caused by a number of conditions).

3. Working EQ: What is the most important factor an orthodontist must consider when        
    treating a patient?